#How to disassemble a 2006 macbook pro pro

'Recyclers have a can-do attitude-they'll say they can do anything, and they will find a way to do it,' Wiens told Ars. Removing the battery 'just takes a different process,' Taggart said.

CEO Jim Taggart told Ars that it has already dealt with some pre-production samples, and that the battery can be separated from the case using a tool similar to a common putty knife. 'We are always looking at issues for different kinds of products, so I don't know that these new MacBook Pros are going to be horribly difficult, or maybe just mildly inconvenient.'ĮCS Refining is more confident that the battery can be efficiently removed from the Retina MacBook Pro, however. Sims is contracted by Apple to recycle the devices gathered by the company's electronics take-back program, and it services Macs, iPhones, and iPads, as well as PCs, smartphones, and other devices from competing manufacturers. Some products come in where the batteries are deep inside or hidden having them glued in makes it a little more difficult, but not a lot more.' 'It's a little more difficult, for sure, than those that pop out. 'We haven't seen it yet for recycling, but we have dealt with glued-in batteries in the past,' Sims Recycling Solutions America President Steve Skurnac told Ars. Surprisingly, both seemed confident that the glued-in battery wouldn't present any major difficulties. 'Ease' of removal is relativeĪrs spoke to two large companies that specialize in recycling electronics to find out their opinions on just how difficult the Retina MacBook Pro's battery is to remove. Her analysis of the battery, based on work by iFixit, was that it can't safely and easily be removed with simple tools, a required criterion for an EPEAT rating.

#How to disassemble a 2006 macbook pro pro

Advertisementīarbara Kyle, speaking for the Electronics Take Back Coalition (ETBC), suggested that the Retina MacBook Pro should not qualify for an EPEAT rating of any kind. Apple's recent complaint implied that the standards had not been updated to account for many of the newer improvements Apple and some other manufacturers had implemented, such as the removal of PVC plastics and brominated flame retardants, or achieving newer, more strict Energy Star ratings. 'Apple products are superior in other important environmental areas not measured by EPEAT, such as removal of toxic materials,' Apple spokesperson Kristin Huget said in defense of the company's withdrawal from EPEAT. And Apple was also involved in creating the IEEE 1680 standards which form the basis of EPEAT's ratings criteria.īut those standards were drafted in 2006 (and ratified in 2009). Apple was a member of EPEAT, a voluntary registry and rating system for electronics manufacturers. As part of Apple's marketing, it has touted the fact that all of its computers had been given EPEAT's highest 'Gold' rating. The move was surprising for a couple of reasons.

Then, just weeks after the Retina MacBook Pro was released, Apple raised eyebrows in the tech industry by removing all of its products from the EPEAT green electronics registry. Apple does offer a battery replacement program, though it costs a pretty penny, at $199. Teardown experts at iFixit criticized the decision by pointing out that the design made repair or replacement difficult, if not outright impossible, for users or third-party repair technicians. That fact alone caused a wave of debate over repair issues. To pack the larger battery inside the thinner case of the Retina MacBook Pro, however, Apple opted to attach the cells directly to the upper unibody casing using an industrial-strength adhesive. The Retina MacBook Pro features a six-cell lithium polymer battery with a 95 Whr capacity-a 23 percent increase over the previous MacBook Pro design. On the other hand, an internal memo sent to AppleCare and certified third-party technicians claims that the battery should not be removed from the aluminum casing 'for any reason.' All due to some glue On the one hand, Apple's position seems to be that the Retina MacBook Pro qualifies for its EPEAT rating because the battery can be easily removed with 'common' tools. Muddying the waters further is Apple itself. But it turns out that some recyclers disagree, saying it isn't dramatically more difficult to safely remove the battery than in other modern devices. Apple submitted the device to the Green Electronics Council for an EPEAT Gold rating last week, prompting critics to argue that the glued-in battery should disqualify it from any rating at all. Apple's solution to shaving thickness from the Retina MacBook Pro-gluing its lithium polymer battery cells directly to the aluminum unibody shell-continues to spark debate among proponents of sustainable electronics.